Skip to main content

the race for contingent talent: a global consumer electronics giant secures niche talent, reduces spend by 16% and improves retention.

talent intelligence powers transition from a fixed markup to a market-driven bill rate model, controlling costs while expanding access to specialized talent for hard-to-fill roles

 

client

a global premium electronics brand

challenge

Facing budget constraints, workforce reductions and sourcing challenges, the company needed to reduce costs while expanding access to specialized talent. Many contractor roles were priced using a fixed markup that applied the same margin across roles, limiting the ability to adjust pricing based on role complexity, talent availability and market conditions.

solution

Through its managed services program (MSP), the company shifted pricing for specialized roles from a fixed markup to a market-driven bill rate model. Using talent intelligence and market data to establish rate ranges, the bill rate model gives suppliers flexibility to negotiate candidate pay and their own margins within defined cost parameters, helping the company engage specialty suppliers and compete for niche talent.

results

  • 16% lower bill rates overall

  • 22% lower bill rates for IT roles and 7% lower for creative roles

  • 99% overall talent retention rate, up from 93% 

  • 62.5 candidate net promoter score (NPS) 


the challenge: controlling costs while attracting specialized talent

At this multinational specialized engineering enterprise, creative and technical talent pioneer the digital technologies that have made the company an industry icon. In an unpredictable market, the company increasingly relies on its contingent workforce for access to the talent it needs to innovate, adapt and grow.

Yet, amid budget constraints, workforce reductions and sourcing challenges, the company needed to reduce overall contingent workforce spend without limiting its ability to compete for niche skills.

The company’s existing pricing model also posed challenges. Contractor roles were priced using a fixed markup, applying the same margin across roles. But specialized searches can require significantly more time, resources and expertise based on role complexity, talent availability, wage inflation and other market conditions. With little ability to adjust their margins, suppliers may overpay candidates to make difficult searches profitable or decline less profitable searches altogether.


Different hiring needs require different pricing strategies:

  • Fixed markup: best for high-volume, standardized hiring

These models use a fixed percentage markup with the same margin across roles. Suppliers have limited ability to adjust their margins based on role complexity, talent availability or market conditions.

  • Bill rate: designed for specialized roles

Bill rate models establish a maximum rate the company will pay for each role based on market data. Within that limit, suppliers can negotiate candidate pay and adjust their own margins, giving them greater ability to compete on both talent and price.


The challenge pointed to a clear opportunity: introduce a more flexible approach to pricing for specialized, giving the company more control over costs while incentivizing suppliers to compete for hard-to-fill roles.

the solution: talent intelligence helps build a competitive pricing model

Building on its long-standing partnership with Randstad Enterprise, the company worked through its managed services program (MSP), delivered by Randstad Sourceright, to transform contingent pricing strategy. It moved to a bill rate model for specialized roles, starting with IT, professional, creative, and accounting and finance. 

To shape its strategy, the company grounds its bill rate model in talent intelligence. The MSP combines internal historical cost data with labor market and competitive intelligence to establish market-driven pricing for specialized roles. These inputs provide insight into supply and demand, compensation and rate benchmarks, skills availability and other market conditions.

The model puts those insights into action in four ways:

1. Establish strategic rate cards

Market intelligence translates into minimum, maximum and recommended bill rate targets for individual roles, giving the company clear parameters for what it will pay.

2. Negotiate within defined cost parameters

Predetermined maximum bill rates establish cost boundaries while allowing suppliers to balance candidate pay and their own margins within those limits.

3. Strengthen supplier competition and talent access

Specialty suppliers have more flexibility to compete for business, including the ability to operate on narrower margins. That flexibility encourages niche suppliers to participate in the program, expanding access to specialized talent while increasing price competition.

4. Respond to changing market dynamics

Biannual rate card reviews incorporate updated market intelligence, while the bill rate structure gives suppliers flexibility to respond as talent availability, demand and other market conditions change.

Once established, the model creates ongoing cost discipline through market-based pricing and supplier competition, helping the company balance talent access with cost management.

the results: 16% lower bill rates, 99% talent retention

By transitioning specialized roles from a fixed markup model to a competitive bill rate structure, the company reduced bill rates while maintaining strong talent retention. Overall, the company has achieved: 

  • 16% lower bill rates overall 

  • 22% lower bill rates for IT roles 

  • 7% lower for creative roles

  • 99% overall talent retention rate, up from 93% 

  • 62.5 candidate net promoter score (NPS)

 

With the new pricing model in place, the company now has a market-driven approach to managing specialized contingent talent that aligns pricing with market conditions, strengthens supplier competition and expands access to critical skills.

Learn how MSP can help get greater value from your contingent workforce strategy.